<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tie performance to business goals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quicktestingtips.com/tips/2010/01/tie-performance-to-business-goals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quicktestingtips.com/tips/2010/01/tie-performance-to-business-goals/</link>
	<description>Your daily feed of short software testing tips...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:09:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Panozzo</title>
		<link>http://www.quicktestingtips.com/tips/2010/01/tie-performance-to-business-goals/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Panozzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quicktestingtips.com/tips/?p=1099#comment-449</guid>
		<description>A similar approach might be to figure out what the actual value of getting a % improvement in different performance metrics.  For example, if you can estimate the cost of delay as well as the value for improving performance, you can give the team a project model to determine when it makes sense to spend time improving the performance and when it makes sense to work on other things or stop altogether.  You&#039;re basically giving the development team more context so they can make an informed decision.  My thinking on this was influenced by Reinertsen&#039;s Managing the Design Factory, specifically Chapter 2:

Project Models
Done from the perspective of the development team
Quantify what overruns of expense, cost, and performance, and for a one-month change in schedule will do to profitability
Better to have simple model that everyone understands and agrees with than to have opaque model — inputs are everything
Predict what a one-month change of schedule by analyzing market and potential competition to project delay scenarios
Benefits of using project model: make better decisions using data, faster decision making, higher buy-in on team decisions

Hope this is along the lines of what you were thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A similar approach might be to figure out what the actual value of getting a % improvement in different performance metrics.  For example, if you can estimate the cost of delay as well as the value for improving performance, you can give the team a project model to determine when it makes sense to spend time improving the performance and when it makes sense to work on other things or stop altogether.  You&#8217;re basically giving the development team more context so they can make an informed decision.  My thinking on this was influenced by Reinertsen&#8217;s Managing the Design Factory, specifically Chapter 2:</p>
<p>Project Models<br />
Done from the perspective of the development team<br />
Quantify what overruns of expense, cost, and performance, and for a one-month change in schedule will do to profitability<br />
Better to have simple model that everyone understands and agrees with than to have opaque model — inputs are everything<br />
Predict what a one-month change of schedule by analyzing market and potential competition to project delay scenarios<br />
Benefits of using project model: make better decisions using data, faster decision making, higher buy-in on team decisions</p>
<p>Hope this is along the lines of what you were thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

